"to [try and] advance the understanding of potential mechanisms underlying insomnia in adults with ASD"

The paper by Vanessa Hohn and colleagues [1] (open-access available here) provides the blogging fodder today and their findings in relation to the presence of insomnia as a "common source of distress in adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD)."

Insomnia is essentially a regular problem in getting to sleep. It has a myriad of 'causes' ranging from uncomfortable sleeping conditions (bed, noise, temperature) to the influence of things like stress, depression and anxiety. Insomnia is no joke. Outside of the potential wide-ranging effects on physical and mental health [2] it puts a person at some heightened risk of all-manner of adverse outcomes [3].

As part of a suite of sleeping-related problems, insomnia is also no stranger to diagnostic labels like autism. With autism in mind, sleep problems that begin in childhood are pretty likely to carry over to adulthood. Nobody knows the precise reason(s) why those on the autism spectrum are more likely to experience sleep problems including insomnia. Some have speculated that the presence of autistic traits may be a risk factor for such sleeping issues (see here) but there is currently little detail regarding the bridge from core autism features to sleep problems. Others have observed an *association* between the presence of other somatic issues occurring alongside autism and sleep problems (see here and see here) but again, further clarity is needed on the hows-and-whys of any relationship and, importantly, what can be done to alleviate such issues.

Hohn et al started with the premise that: "Two characteristics of ASD could be relevant to insomnia complaints by hampering the entrainment of a circadian sleep-wake rhythm." They specifically talk about examining the link between sensory responsiveness and social skills in the context of insomnia in adults with ASD.

"Data were obtained from the Netherlands Autism Register (NAR), which is a longitudinal register including approximately 2000 individuals with ASD." Some 630 participants with autism were included for study, where "individual responses given to three measures of interest during an online survey in 2015 were analyzed." Those 'measures' were the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), the Sensory Perception Quotient and the Autism Spectrum Quotient-28. The combined data were analysed.

Results: bearing in mind that this was a study exclusively including self-report from participants with autism - with no non-autistic control group - and one that relied on a single temporal snapshot of insomnia symptoms, one has to be a little careful with the findings. So: "The mean ISI score in the present sample was 9.50 (SD = 6.01), which is indicative of subthreshold insomnia and higher than means reported for the general population ranging between 1 and 7... but lower than values obtained from insomnia patients ranging between 17 and 20." Further, about half of participants scored in the "absence of insomnia" category with only around 20% of the group recording either moderate or severe insomnia. This tells us that, again according to self-report (and not using actigraphy for example), insomnia was not necessarily a widespread issue in this cohort but present in a not-significant number: about 1 in 5 people.

Next: "Primary analyses revealed that each of the covariates had a significant impact on the ISI total score." What this means is that biological sex, gender and medication use potentially played a role in insomnia. Women participating in the study tended to score higher on the ISI than men, and those aged 45-65 also seemingly showed more of a tendency towards insomnia. I don't think anyone would be really surprised with the idea that age and insomnia might be connected [4].

Some further statistical analysis of their results led researchers to opine on: "positive associations of insomnia severity with general and visual sensory hyper-reactivity and with impairment of social skills." I'm not too au fait with the specifics of the statistical modelling technique used by the authors - hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses (HMLR) - but can see what they did and how they did it, including "controlling for confounding effects of covariates" such as "medication, biological sex, intelligence, and age" (as previously mentioned). That being said, I'll draw your attention to some other conclusions reached by the authors: "The rather small effect sizes reported in the present study suggest that other factors not assessed in this study contribute to the emergence and persistence of sleep problems in adults with ASD."

The Hohn study does add something to the literature on sleep difficulties being experienced by quite a few people (children and adults) on the autism spectrum. I'm not overly convinced that they've stumbled upon evidence that core autistic features such as social skills problems and sensory issues are necessarily central to insomnia in their cohort but am willing to concede that they might play a role. Personally, I'd be inclined to go back to that data on 'comorbid' issues like gastrointestinal (GI) problems (see here) or breathing issues like apnoea (see here) as being something to explore further; also with the assumption that such issues are potentially 'treatable' and could have an important knock-on effect for something like insomnia and other sleep issues with autism in mind...

Oh, and don't forget the molecular handyperson that is melatonin and it's potential role in all of this (see here and see here). That and other potential avenues of research/clinical interest (see here)...

----------

[1] Hohn VD. et al. Insomnia Severity in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder is Associated with sensory Hyper-Reactivity and Social Skill Impairment. J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 Feb 9.

[2] Fernandez-Mendoza J. & Vgontzas AN. Insomnia and its impact on physical and mental health. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2013;15(12):418.

[3] Garbarino S. et al. Insomnia is associated with road accidents. Further evidence from a study on truck drivers. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0187256.

[4] Foley DJ. et al. Sleep complaints among elderly persons: an epidemiologic study of three communities. Sleep. 1995 Jul;18(6):425-32.

----------

Big data does... the extreme male brain theory of autism and the Empathizing–Systemizing theory

"Two long-standing psychological theories – the empathising-systemising theory of sex differences and the extreme male brain theory of autism – have been confirmed by our new study, the largest of its kind to date."

That was the opening sentence to a write-up (see here) of a recent research paper published by David Greenberg and colleagues [1] which sought to "test 10 predictions from the Empathizing–Systemizing (E-S) theory of sex differences and the Extreme Male Brain (EMB) theory of autism." The 'big data' words included in the title of this post refer to the collection of data from hundreds of thousands of people as part of a TV documentary that aired here in Blighty called 'Are you autistic?' whose data were included for study. This follows a similar format from some of the co-authors on the Greenberg paper on previous research occasions (see here).

Minus any charges of plagiarism, a few descriptors might be useful. First: "The first theory, known as the empathising-systemising theory of typical sex differences, posits that, on average, females will score higher on tests of empathy than males, and that, on average, males will score higher on tests of systemising than females." Second: "The second theory, known as the extreme male brain theory of autism, extends the empathising-systemising theory. It posits that autistic people will, on average, show a shift towards “masculinised” scores on measures of empathy and systemising." Researchers also talked about something called a 'd score': "the difference between each person’s score on the systemising and empathy tests" in their research, alongside mention of the words 'brain type'.

As part of the interactivity of that TV documentary, some 670,000 people "who indicated they were males or females" completed various measures: "the Autism Spectrum Quotient-10 (AQ-10)... the Empathy Quotient (EQ)..., Systemizing Quotient-Revised (SQ-R)..., and the Sensory Perception Quotient (SPQ)" via an on-line questionnaire portal. About 36,000 people who took part "indicated that they had been diagnosed with an “Autism Spectrum Condition”." Data from responses to the questionnaires were crunched pertinent to those 10 predictions from both theories (said predictions concerned sex differences based on responses to the questionnaires, those various 'brain types' and how responses might look with reference to the presentation of autistic traits). For good measure, researchers also describe carrying out an 'independent replication' of their findings on a separate cohort of adults ("14,354 participants (226 autistic individuals, and 14,119 controls)"). Although there were some minor differences from the larger main trial, to all intents and purposes the same procedures were employed "for calculating brain types and performing statistical analysis."

Results: well "all 10 predictions from the E-S and EMB theories" were confirmed. So for example, men taking part in the study "had a shift towards a high d score" suggestive of being more likely to be systemisers than empathisers, whilst "typical females had a shift towards a low d score" (i.e. more likely to empathetic than systemiser). The previous STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) findings [2] were also supported, in that: "STEM professionals on average scored significantly higher on the AQ" suggesting a link between the choice of STEM career and autistic traits. And for those reporting a diagnosis of autism or autism spectrum disorder (ASD): "autistic people, regardless of their sex, had a shift towards an even higher d score than typical males" (systemisers) but "were not more likely to work in STEM occupations, compared with controls."

There is a lot to take in from the Greenberg research and related commentary. The study has a number of things going for it insofar as the huge participant size and the use of an independent replication set to confirm findings. These factors should not be underestimated. The limitations? Well, self-report is still one of them, and the fact that at least one of the questionnaires used is probably picking up a lot more than just 'autistic traits' (see here). I'm also inclined to point out once again that the *correlation* between autistic traits and STEM career choice did not seemingly extend to those with autism being "more likely to work in STEM occupations, compared with controls." Going back to that 'what is being tested' issue, the AQ for example, might also be picking up something linked to "loneliness, social anxiety, depression, and anxiety" [3] or even something approaching the schizophrenia spectrum (see here) or personality disorder (see here). Indeed, one might have to entertain the idea that the definition 'autistic traits' may not tell the whole story in this study.

I have to admit to being still a little sceptical of big psychological theories such as the EMB or the E-S theory of sex differences. The reason? Whilst attractive in their compartmentalising nature, real life is often far from being so clear-cut and linear. The fact also that an important part of the evidence behind such theories remains a little 'fluffy' (see here for example) cannot be readily brushed under the scientific carpet. As for the use of the term 'brain types', well, I can see what the authors were getting at, but I'm not convinced such terminology is particularly useful. 'Brain types' kinda sits in the same category as 'neurotypical' (see here). I was also drawn to the fact that the authors have to explicitly say that their results don't mean that "autistic people lack empathy" and that "autistic people are not hyper-male in general." It kinda tells you how some of the history behind these theories shows that they have not exactly been received with open arms by many.

But even with all that, the Greenberg results cannot be just discounted, and more research on this topic is indicated.

----------

[1] Greenberg DM. et al. Testing the Empathizing-Systemizing theory of sex differences and the Extreme Male Brain theory of autism in half a million people. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 12. pii: 201811032.

[2] Ruzich E. et al. Sex and STEM Occupation Predict Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) Scores in Half a Million People. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 21;10(10):e0141229.

[3] Reed P. et al. Loneliness and Social Anxiety Mediate the Relationship between Autism Quotient and Quality of Life in University Students. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities. 2016; 28: 723-733.

----------

The Sensory Perception Quotient (SPQ) and autism

Today I'd like to bring to your attention the paper by Teresa Tavassoli and colleagues [1] (open-access) who talked about the development of the Sensory Perception Quotient (SPQ), a new tool designed to assess "basic sensory hyper- and hyposensitivity" across our basic senses, specifically with the autism spectrum conditions (ASCs) in mind. For those who follow the IMFAR meetings, you might have already heard something about the SPQ in previous years (see here).

The purpose of the Tavassoli paper was three-fold: (i) assess how valid and reliable the SPQ was against a rival tool looking at the sensory domain: the SensOR Inventory [2], [ii] "to investigate if adults with and without ASC show differences on the SPQ" and (iii) to look at whether/how sensory issues linked to the signs and symptoms of autism, via use of another quotient, the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ).

The results: well, bearing in mind everything was done on-line: "The SPQ shows good internal consistency and concurrent validity and differentiates between adults with and without ASC". Also: "greater sensory sensitivity is associated with more autistic traits".

Obviously there is quite a bit more to do on the SPQ before anyone gets too carried away, including the possibility of examining a broader sensory phenotype if the findings by Mirko Uljarević and colleagues [3] survive replication. The fact that participants were all adults and all able to self-report is an important point to make about the Tavassoli study, as were their scores on the [adapted] Raven's Progressive Matrices looking at cognitive functioning putting those on the autism spectrum in the typical range on a par with control participants. As an aside, I'm happy that Raven's was used in this trial given some conversations I remember having with the late Ann-Mari Knivsberg who was a big fan of this schedule.

As the authors note, the inclusion of sensory issues into the revised DSM-5 diagnostic schedule means that there is going to be a lot more focus on these issues as and when the DSM-5 starts picking up diagnostic momentum around the world. More than that though, the authors importantly talk about how the SPQ might be a useful aid to those archetypal all-rounders, the OTs, in "assessing the sensory needs of people with autism". Surely anything that helps them do their job more efficiently and person-centred has got to be a good thing.

To close, a new Flash Gordon movie potentially due? How can they possibly improve on the last one... Flash, ah, ah... (by Queen).

----------

[1] Tavassoli T. et al. The Sensory Perception Quotient (SPQ): development and validation of a new sensory questionnaire for adults with and without autism. Molecular Autism 2014, 5:29

[2] Schoen SA. et al. Pilot study of the Sensory Over-Responsivity Scales: assessment and inventory. Am J Occup Ther. 2008 Jul-Aug;62(4):393-406.

[3] Uljarević M. et al. First evidence of sensory atypicality in mothers of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Molecular Autism 2014, 5:26.

----------

Tavassoli, T., Hoekstra, R., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2014). The Sensory Perception Quotient (SPQ): development and validation of a new sensory questionnaire for adults with and without autism Molecular Autism, 5 (1) DOI: 10.1186/2040-2392-5-29