Showing posts with label arbaclofen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label arbaclofen. Show all posts

Friday, 31 May 2019

Baclofen is back: "Baclofen as an adjuvant therapy for autism"

"Our data support [the] safety and efficacy of baclofen as an adjuvant to risperidone for improvement of hyperactivity symptoms in children with ASD [autism spectrum disorder]."

So said the findings reported by Seyedeh-Mahsa Mahdavinasab and colleagues [1] talking about the use of baclofen as an add-on medicine in the context of risperidone use in relation to autism. Baclofen by the way, is typically known as "a gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) agonist" (binds to the GABA receptors and activates them) which accounts for its use as "a skeletal muscle relaxant" given the inhibitory function of GABA and GABA receptors.

Why the 'baclofen is back' sentiment expressed in the title of this post? Well, a few years back there was some excitement about a compound called STX209 otherwise known as arbaclofen in the context of a genetic condition manifesting autistic signs and symptoms (see here) and autism itself. Arbaclofen is an enantiomer (mirror image in a chemical sense) of baclofen, but unfortunately fell by the wayside after some less than impressive results emerged from clinical trials (see here). Arbaclofen might have been kicked into the long grass for now but baclofen it seems, is still on the autism research agenda...

Researchers report results based on a "10-week randomized-controlled study aimed at evaluating the potential of baclofen as an adjuvant therapy to enhance the effect of risperidone in children with ASD." Risperidone is an antipsychotic which is indicated for selective use with children with autism (see here) specifically to treat/manage aggressive and challenging behaviours. They reported that several outcome measures saw a change - a positive change - specifically in relation to hyperactivity behaviours which can often accompany aggression. Importantly, they also noted that during and after 10 weeks of add-on baclofen use, adverse events were reported to be at a minimum.

There is more to do in this area before any sweeping generalisations are made. I personally would like to see more data on potential best- and non-responders in the context that GABA is still a topic of interest to autism research (see here). I know also that some people might be a little put-out by the idea that more medication is added to the lives of young children with autism and worries about how this might impact them in later years. We need a lot more data.

----------

[1] Mahdavinasab SM. et al. Baclofen as an adjuvant therapy for autism: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 12.

----------

Tuesday, 9 April 2013

IACC and summary of research advances in autism 2012

I'm very much an outsider looking in when it comes to the goings-on at the US Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC). I'm a Limey working here in Blighty (translation: Brit working in the UK) not in the States and as far as I can see we don't have such an agency here in the UK. Yes, we do have the NICE review which is coming to a close shortly but nothing like the IACC which seems to orchestrate many autism-related activities in the States, including research.

Annually, the IACC produce a summary of autism research which kinda brings together the great and the good of progress in understanding what might constitute autism (the autisms). They've just released the 2012 review of autism research (see here) which contains some interesting studies including those covered on this blog.

A few choice studies and posts are presented for your attention:

Six developmental trajectories.... by Fountain and colleagues.
The branched chain amino acid phenotype.... by Novarino and colleagues.
De novo mutations and paternal age.... by Kong and colleagues.
Kum-ba-arbaclofen... by Berry-Kravis and colleagues.
Wandering.... by Anderson and colleagues.
Mortality.... by Bilder and colleagues.
1 in 88.... by the CDC.

'Nuff said.

Tuesday, 2 April 2013

Gastrointestinal comorbidity for World Autism Awareness Day

Today (Tuesday 2 April 2013) is World Autism Awareness Day (WAAD).

I don't exactly know how one is supposed to communicate this message ('Happy world autism awareness day' just doesn't roll off the tongue). So I guess all I will say is to reiterate the subtext of this blog on what the spectrum - the very wide spectrum - means: "To some it means a need for life-long support. To others it is part of the varied tapestry of humanity. To all it means a need to foster a welcoming society with appropriate support and opportunities."

Onwards. Having discussed the latest paper from Drs Stephen Walker and Arthur Krigsman on bowel pathology in cases of autism potentially denoting a distinct condition from other inflammatory bowel diseases and stumbling upon the paper by Peeters and colleagues* on functional defecation disorder and autistic traits, I thought it appropriate to pop into the DeLorean and revisit a paper which never really received the recognition it deserved.

The subject matter for today is the paper by Karoly Horvath and colleagues** published in 1999 as we begin another trip down the autism research memory lane, same as I did when covering the the Mary Goodwin paper from 1971 on the gut-brain axis and autism (see here) and the John Money autism and autoimmunity paper also from 1971 (see here).
Hadrian's Wall @ Wikipedia  

Remember my name
The name Karoly Horvath will probably be familiar to quite a few people who've been on the autism research scene for a while. Another of Dr Horvath's papers*** created a bit of stir a while back based on some very preliminary findings on the use of the digestive hormone, secretin for cases of autism.

Following some initial reports of "transient, marginally significant improvements in autistic behaviors" in some cases as per studies like the one from Coniglio and colleagues****, a whole slew of subsequent trials have painted a rather less positive picture on the use of secretin for autism as per the review by Krishnaswami and colleagues***** (open-access) which quite emphatically stated that "secretin as a treatment approach for ASDs warrants no further study".

I'm not one to normally challenge paper conclusions - particularly systematic reviews - but will perhaps contrast that quote with the closing remarks made by the Cochrane Library review of Williams and colleagues******. They left the secretin research door slightly ajar for those who were potentially able to  identify "important subgroups of children with ASD who could benefit from secretin because of a proven link between the action of secretin and the known cause of their ASD, or the type of problems they are experiencing". I'm a great believer in subgroups when it comes to autism, or rather the autisms, and how a diagnosis of autism is seemingly protective of nothing when it comes to other conditions/states, so you can perhaps assume which quote was my preference.

Factoids
Anyhow, back to the Horvath 1999 paper. A few interesting factoids from their report:

  • Thirty-six children all diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD), mean age 5.7 years, formed the participant group. Children were all referred to the gastroenterology (GI) clinic where the authors worked following the presence of various GI symptoms ranging from abdominal pain to chronic diarrhoea and various other presentations.
  • As well as quite a bit of review of participants' medical history, various clinical investigations were undertaken which included a "full upper gastrointestinal workup", analysis of digestive enzyme function in the small intestine and some histological examination.
  • Results: quite a few important findings. Reflux esophagitis was present in nearly 70% of participants (25/36). Chronic inflammation of the gastric mucosa was determined in 15 children. Reduced disaccharidase activity was present in approximately 60% of children, and in particular low lactase levels. Following administration of secretin, participants with autism and diarrhoea comorbid showed signs of increased pancreatico-biliary fluid output potentially indicative of "upregulation of the secretin receptors" itself potentially related to "either a defect in secretin production or a problem of release from the intestinal S cells".
  • "There was no evidence of either fungal or bacterial overgrowth in the duodenum" was another finding.

I know there is a lot to take in from those results so I'm going to try and put them into some kind of perspective with some of the other related literature in the peer-reviewed domain.

Lactose intolerance
I'll start with the disaccharidase activity side of things. The Horvath results were in some respects ahead of their time with their findings in this area. I've talked previously about the Rafail Kushak paper and their findings of the frequency "of lactase deficiency was 58% in autistic children ≤ 5 years old and 65% in older patients". Notice the similarity in the percentages between Horvath and Kushak. Indeed, this whole area of carbohydrate malabsorption present in cases of autism was very nicely continued by the Brent Williams paper looking at enzyme activity and autism. I know a few people have talked about how some of these findings might overlap with for example, the various reports on the use and effectiveness of a gluten- and casein-free (cereal grains and mammalian dairy free) diet in some cases of autism. Certainly, I wouldn't rule out a possible overlap to account for any results.

Reflux and GERD
Gastroesophageal reflux and reflux esophagitis - states pertaining to inflammation of the esophagus - were also commonly reported in the participant group and indeed also correlated with various behavioural manifestations noted in some cases (nighttime wakening, signs of irritability, abdominal discomfort) which are "typically reported by non-autistic children with esophagitis". A little reading around this topic suggests that many cases of such esophagitis are tied into things like GERD - gastroesophageal reflux disease - which is basically about stomach acid rising up instead of staying where it should be and causing damage. That being said, other explanations have also surfaced to potentially account for the damage done during GERD (see the paper by Souza and colleagues*******) highlighting a possible role for cytokines in this process. I'm also conscious of the findings of eosinophilic esophagitis being reported in individual cases of autism (see here). In terms of management options and without heading down any medical advice giving path, I was very interested to see a body of work appearing supporting the use of baclofen for cases of GERD********, a derivative of which - arbaclofen - has recently been touted as a potential intervention option for cases of autism. One has to wonder whether kum-ba-arbaclofen might be doing so much more than just affecting GABA receptors?

I'm going to stop there with the Horvath paper and its quite important observations. Once again it is a good example of how, just because we see a rising tide of new findings on autism or any other condition or state, we shouldn't neglect the older literature (published pre-social media) and the valuable insights that it has provided. Indeed, I am going to champion the paper by Horvath et al as an important one; particularly when it came to the assessment of carbohydrate digestive enzyme activity because it was truly ahead of its time and very possibly something that you might hear more about in the coming years of autism research.

Importantly for WAAD, the Horvath paper is a stark reminder that awareness of the autism spectrum should extend beyond just the triad (very soon to be dyad) of core symptoms and into the range of often very pronounced comorbidities which can also exist and affect quality of life. And just in case you need a more recent example of this, have a look at this paper from Francisca van Steensel and colleagues********* (open-access) and their findings on the over 50% rate of psychiatric comorbidity reported in their pediatric cohort. Their focus on 'anxiety disorders' does not need any more chatter from me.

To close, something musically, a little more contemporary. Bruno Mars and Locked Out Of Heaven.

----------

* Peeters B. et al. Autism spectrum disorders in children with functional defecation disorders. J Pediatr. March 2013.

** Horvath K. et al. Gastrointestinal abnormalities in children with autistic disorder. J Pediatr. 1999; 135: 559-563.

*** Horvath K. et al. Improved social and language skills after secretin administration in patients with autistic spectrum disorders. J Assoc Acad Minor Phys. 1998; 9: 9-15.

**** Coniglio SJ. et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of single-dose intravenous secretin as treatment for children with autism. J Pediatr. 2001; 138: 649-655.

***** Krishnaswami S. et al. A systematic review of secretin for children with autism spectrum disorders. Pediatrics. 2011; 127: e1322–e1325.

****** Williams K. et al. Intravenous secretin for autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 4: CD003495.

******* Souza RF. et al. Gastroesophageal reflux might cause esophagitis through a cytokine-mediated mechanism rather than caustic acid injury. Gastroenterology. 2009; 137: 1776-1784.

******** Cossentino MJ. et al. Randomised clinical trial: the effect of baclofen in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux - a randomised prospective study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. March 2012.

********* van Steensel FJA. et al. Psychiatric comorbidity in children with autism spectrum disorders: a comparison with children with ADHD. J Child Fam Stud. 2013; 22: 368–376.

----------

ResearchBlogging.org Horvath K, Papadimitriou JC, Rabsztyn A, Drachenberg C, & Tildon JT (1999). Gastrointestinal abnormalities in children with autistic disorder. The Journal of pediatrics, 135 (5), 559-63 PMID: 10547242

Thursday, 20 September 2012

Kum-ba-arbaclofen

I assume quite a few people have already read the various reports about STX209* (most definitely not to be confused with ED-209) otherwise known as arbaclofen with Fragile X syndrome in mind. Hailed as 'The First Drug that Could Ease Social Withdrawal in Autism' according to one news source, the headlines are based on the results of this study by Elizabeth Berry-Kravis and colleagues** complemented by this study by Henderson and colleagues*** published on the same day in the same journal.

OK reverse please.

Seaside Therapeutics, yet another pharmaceutical company with autism or autistic behaviours in their sights, had been working for quite a while now on a new formulation, a derivative of baclofen, itself a derivative of everyone's favourite inhibitory neurotransmitter, GABA - gamma aminobutyric acid (see here for a description) as a possible therapeutic for certain behaviours associated with autism. Baclofen is normally indicated for the treatment of spasticity resulting from conditions like multiple sclerosis and cerebral palsy.

GABA is the yin to glutamate - an excitatory neurotransmitter - the yang. The balancing act between excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters has, on more than one occasions, been suggested to be slightly skewed in some cases of autism (and other conditions and states) as glutamate takes centre stage.

So then STX209 is, as its chemical relations are, recognised as an agonist for GABAB receptors which in turn inhibits the release of glutamate (and aspartate). You can perhaps see therefore where the interest lies.

I know quite a lot of the press around STX209 has focused on autism, but to be more accurate, Fragile X syndrome  - which presents with autistic features - is the target patient group based on the trials completed so far. The suggestion being that the primary mutation associated with Fragile X syndrome - FMR1 gene - has some knock-on effects**** including "activation of mGluR5, a metabotropic glutamate receptor". Avid watchers of the autism research landscape might remember mGluR5 as being a target for other pharmaceutics with autism/autistic characteristics in mind, including another interesting compound, GRN-529***** (at least in mice).

So:

  • The recent trial of STX209** relied on human participants rather than mice, 63 of them in all, mostly male and all carrying "a full mutation in the FMR1 gene". 
  • Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled (all the things that science really likes to hear about) was the study design and outcome-wise, the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) and the Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales (VABS) are listed.
  • The primary endpoint of the study was a focus on irritability, which actually didn't come up trumps over placebo. 
  • Having said that, there were some significant positive effects noted on areas of social avoidance in the treatment group acknowledging that the absolute number of participants in the study was relatively small and actually got even smaller following some post-hoc analysis.
  • Importantly also, a few side-effects were noted, particularly in the treatment group including URTIs (13%) and headaches (8%).

I note that Seaside Therapeutics have quite recently agreed some terms over STX209 with pharmaceutical giant Roche which suggests to me that things might potentially get quite big for arbaclofen rather quickly. By saying that, I'm not in anyway endorsing the medicine. Quite a bit more data is required on long-term safety, efficacy and best responder characteristics.

With that in mind, I'll be quite interested to see the results of further trials of STX209 as are apparently planned and/or getting underway including a trial specific to children and young adults diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorders (see here). As to the mechanism of STX209 to GABAB receptors to improving social avoidance... more investigation needed I assume.

---------

* Hopkins CR. ACS Chemical Neuroscience Molecule Spotlight on STX209 (Arbaclofen). ACS Chem Neurosci. 2011; 2: 381.

** Berry-Kravis EM. et al. Effects of STX209 (Arbaclofen) on neurobehavioral function in children and adults with Fragile X Syndrome: a randomized, controlled, phase 2 trial. Science Translational Medicine. 2012; 4: 152ra127

*** Henderson C. Reversal of disease-related pathologies in the Fragile X mouse model by selective activation of GABAB receptors with arbaclofen. Science Translational Medicine. 2012; 4: 152ra128

**** Dölen G. et al. Correction of fragile X syndrome in mice. Neuron. 2007: 56: 955-962.

***** Silverman JL. et al. Negative allosteric modulation of the mGluR5 receptor reduces repetitive behaviors and rescues social deficits in mouse models of autism. Science Translational Medicine. 2012; 4: 131ra51.

----------

ResearchBlogging.org Elizabeth M. Berry-Kravis, David Hessl, Barbara Rathmell, Peter Zarevics, Maryann Cherubini, Karen Walton-Bowen, Yi Mu, Danh V. Nguyen, Joseph Gonzalez-Heydrich, Paul P. Wang, Randall L. Carpenter, Mark F. Bear, & Randi J. Hagerman (2012). Effects of STX209 (Arbaclofen) on neurobehavioral function in children and adults with Fragile X Syndrome: a randomized, controlled, phase 2 trial Science Translational Medicine DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004214