|Altogether Now? @ Wikipedia|
Continuing the pesticide theme, I'm talking today about the paper by Janie Shelton and colleagues  (open-access) and their results strengthening "the evidence linking neurodevelopmental disorders with gestational pesticide exposures, and particularly, organophosphates". Some of the press on this study be seen here.
Based on data derived from the CHARGE study (beincharge!) authors reported that maternal residence during pregnancy close to locations undertaking "agricultural pesticide application" might elevate the risk of offspring autism; something previously discussed by some of the authors . Results from CHARGE by the way, have already talked about other environmental associations with autism risk such as air pollution (see here). This initiative also recently confirmed what many people already knew in saying the gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms seem to be over-represented in cases of autism (see here).
The Shelton paper is open-access but here are a few pointers:
- With an authorship list of the great and the good associated with CHARGE, commercial pesticide use data was linked to the addresses of mothers when pregnant for groups diagnosed with autism (n=486) or developmental delay (DD) (n=168) compared with asymptomatic controls (n=316) living in California, USA. As alluded to in a post on that most undesirable of jobs - the commercial pesticide applicator - commercial pesticide use tends to be quite tightly regulated as a result of the potential for health effects when mis-used.
- Various models and algorithms built up a statistical picture of different classes of pesticides, their use and when and where they sprayed. The authors aimed to ascertain whether gestational exposure was linked to autism risk and whether there were "specific windows of vulnerability during gestation".
- Results: bearing in mind there were quite a few estimates built into this study, a few points are worth mentioning. "Proximity to organophosphates at some time during gestation was associated with a 60% increased risk for ASD". Organophosphate (OP) pesticides were also "the most commonly applied agricultural pesticide near the home during pregnancy" and chlorpyrifos exposure in particular, during the 2nd trimester, seemed to show some association with offspring ASD risk.
- "Children of mothers residing near pyrethroid insecticide applications, just prior to conception or during 3rd trimester were at greater risk for both ASD and DD". Pyrethroids were the "second most commonly applied class of pesticides".
- A few additional points: males were slightly more likely than females to be exposed to pesticides during gestation, and the effects of multiple exposures (various different classes of pesticides) was generally "not found to be higher that the observations of the individual classes of pesticides".
Reiterating that this was a study based on estimation rather than looking at actual individual pesticide exposure during pregnancy or any biological testing for said exposure, this is an interesting study. I say that not to further condemn pesticides, which actually do quite a good job at helping to maintain our food supply and reduce our exposure to various pests. But rather that further study is indicated in this area as a result. The authors note the various strengths of their study based to a large extent on the fairly extensive data held on CHARGE participants. Likewise they note that their study did not for example, take into account "external non-agricultural sources" of pesticides such as those which many of us see sprayed around our homes, gardens and other areas of residence/work which could have affected their data. An 'underestimate' in actual exposure according to some external commentary on the study.
The question of pesticide exposure being potentially linked to autism risk carries quite a bit of the same baggage as the air pollution correlation. Yes, to some degree, we're all pretty unfit for consumption (see here) as a function of our 'chemical load' - bearing in mind the mis-representation of that word. Some people use this generality as a stick to beat such hypotheses on environment being potentially linked to conditions like autism (yes, we know the autisms are a complicated set of conditions). But as we've seen with the air pollution work, it may be the sum of the environmental risks combined with some genetic fragility which eventually provides the more important answers (see here); something which Shelton et al conclude: "Further research on gene-by-environment interactions may reveal vulnerable sub-populations". I might at this point also throw in a related post on Reelin and OPs as one area where we might begin searching.
In terms of the mechanism of effect, well if other autism research is anything to go by, it's gonna be complicated and probably not just confined to old the grey-pink matter. The obvious place to start looking would be the biological mechanisms which we rely on to metabolise things like OPs. PON1 is a good example, and as I've mentioned in other posts (see here) how PON1 has already seen some autism research action . Indeed the paper by Gaita and colleagues  adds to the interest here and their findings of decreased serum arylesterase activity in case of autism. Paşca and colleagues  further suggested that a correlation (that word again) between high levels of homocysteine and low serum paraoxonase 1 arylesterase activity in cases of autism might be important. Certainly, when it comes to the 'big H' there is quite a bit of data with autism in mind (see here) but I'm not going to get ahead of myself here. I'll also direct your attention to other research talking about in-utero OP exposure being linked to shortened gestational duration  as an example of how effects may be peripheral as well as central. Oh and how PON1 enzyme levels might also tie into birth measurements .
If there is a take-home point to this post it is that the Shelton results suggestive of a link between gestational pesticide exposure and autism risk invite quite a bit more further scientific inspection of this area. I don't give clincial or medical advice on this blog but certainly the idea that pregnant women should perhaps "take special care to avoid contact with agricultural chemicals whenever possible" seems like a sensible statement to make (see here).
 Ghaleiha A. et al. Galantamine efficacy and tolerability as an augmentative therapy in autistic children: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Psychopharmacol. 2013 Oct 15;28(7):677-685.
 Shelton JF. et al. Neurodevelopmental disorders and prenatal residential proximity to agricultural pesticides: The CHARGE study. Environ Health Perspect. 2014: June 23.
 Shelton JF. et al. Tipping the balance of autism risk: potential mechanisms linking pesticides and autism. Environ Health Perspect. 2012 Jul;120(7):944-51.
 D'Amelio M. et al. Paraoxonase gene variants are associated with autism in North America, but not in Italy: possible regional specificity in gene-environment interactions. Mol Psychiatry. 2005 Nov;10(11):1006-16.
 Gaita L. et al. Decreased serum arylesterase activity in autism spectrum disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2010 Dec 30;180(2-3):105-13.
 Paşca SP. et al. High levels of homocysteine and low serum paraoxonase 1 arylesterase activity in children with autism. Life Sci. 2006 Apr 4;78(19):2244-8.
 Eskenazi B. et al. Association of in Utero Organophosphate Pesticide Exposure and Fetal Growth and Length of Gestation in an Agricultural Population. Environ Health Perspect. 2004; 112(10): 1116–1124.
 Harley KG. et al. Association of organophosphate pesticide exposure and paraoxonase with birth outcome in Mexican-American women. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23923.