tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548560205914833324.post4501692916923956482..comments2023-04-23T00:16:48.148+01:00Comments on Questioning Answers: GcMAF, nagalase and autismPaul Whiteleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14288851488012254897noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548560205914833324.post-9707148361431785122012-12-12T09:02:07.027+00:002012-12-12T09:02:07.027+00:00I work part time as customer follow up for First I...I work part time as customer follow up for First Immune GcMAF and also monitor the web for mentions of GcMAF, hence I read your very interesting and well researched blog. In response to pD, I can assure you it works across the board and that parents of children with mild ADHD are seeing improvements, in fact this morning I received this reply - "Although C was diagnosed with autism 8 years ago he is now really adhd so the changes may be more subtle. He scored himself on the symptom severity profile. C says he feels energized after the jabs and has looked forward to having the last 2 jabs." So you can see, it isn't just the 'tough nuts' that it is working on. But, it only works on 85% of cases, there are 15% that show no improvement. Interestingly, we have also just seen improvements in type 1 diabetes, and that was a surprise to us. But it appears that also can have its roots in viral infection, and all GcMAF does is to improve the immune system.Lesley Bankshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00861944079763452469noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548560205914833324.post-81590108315663193052012-12-11T23:26:43.095+00:002012-12-11T23:26:43.095+00:00Thanks Paul.
Yamamoto was indeed the first, but t...Thanks Paul.<br /><br />Yamamoto was indeed the first, but the Professors Ruggiero and Pacini team of 10 scientists have done as much or more work on GcMAF. <br /><br />The GcMAF papers published on the American Pubmed system show many institutions and about 115 eminent scientists have been involved so far.<br /><br />I agree with your point about more research into autism mechanisms, but about 1,500 autistic children have now been through GcMAF treatment, (1000 through Dr Bradstreet, 200 through Dr Antonucci in Italy, smaller numbers through other doctors) and the results are pretty much uniform - 85% respond, and 15% have autism eradicated.<br /><br />And for the other 15% it does nothing at all. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15235757507557766710noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548560205914833324.post-24277235940890654792012-12-11T21:59:18.302+00:002012-12-11T21:59:18.302+00:00Thanks for the comment David.
No offence was inte...Thanks for the comment David.<br /><br />No offence was intended in that statement aside from noting that Yamamoto features heavily in the research so far conducted on Gc-MAF: <br />http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=gcmaf<br /><br />With autism in mind (the topic of this paper and post), Gc-MAF is currently not well understood insofar as autism is not well understood, and why nagalase levels for example, are elevated in some cases "beyond levels typically observed in metastatic cancer patients and HIV-infected patients". <br /><br />By saying this I'm not trying to take away from Dr Bradstreet's results; merely that these results invite much more scientific inquiry on both potential mechanism(s) and also related to clinical outcome (i.e. presentation of autistic and other symptoms).Paul Whiteleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14288851488012254897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548560205914833324.post-34474703954646930062012-12-11T20:47:40.433+00:002012-12-11T20:47:40.433+00:00" given that one lab seems to be producing al..." given that one lab seems to be producing all the research." There are 48 research papers on GcMAF produced in a dozen research laboratories in countries including Japan, Italy, Belgium the UK and the USA - right around the world. Yes, the gcmaf.eu lab does both research and supplies the public, including the GcMAF for Dr Bradstreets work, but they are not the only research laboratory by a long chalk.<br /><br />GcMAF is a very well understood molecule. And its not controversial. Its the body's way of eradicating viruses - including those of autism. In viral, bacterial diseases and cancer, GcMAF is often the missing part of the immune system.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15235757507557766710noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548560205914833324.post-72846707050018105202012-12-11T18:45:56.226+00:002012-12-11T18:45:56.226+00:00Thanks pD.
The Enstrom paper: http://www.ncbi.nlm...Thanks pD.<br /><br />The Enstrom paper: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3014091/ remains of some real importance to autism for lots of different reasons. More reading on my part I think...<br /><br />I agree that questions about the representativeness of the Bradstreet cohort will need to be answered and whilst this paper is an initial foray into the world of nagalase and Gc-MAF and autism, we are left tantalised about many different variables potentially affecting the results and generalisability to other cases and other medical histories.Paul Whiteleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14288851488012254897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548560205914833324.post-79207554276628176692012-12-11T16:58:30.471+00:002012-12-11T16:58:30.471+00:00Hi Paul Whiteley -
Interesting stuff. I can tel...Hi Paul Whiteley - <br /><br />Interesting stuff. I can tell you that my son with autism gets sick all the time, and stays sick a long time, for whatever that is worth. Speaking specifically towards viral clearance, it is interesting to note that when Enstrom (<i>Differential monocyte responses to TLR ligands in children with autism spectrum disorders</i>) toggled monocytes with different ligands, she reported that TLRs which recognize bacterial molecular patterns responded with more vigor, some TLRs that recognize viral infections responded <i>less</i> robustly compared to the control group.<br /><br />I think that it is important to note that Bradstreets cohort likely isn't a random sampling of kids with autism; he's a big DAN doctor, and most of the people who are going to him likely are doing so because:<br /><br />1) They have children that are severely affected. <br /><br />2) They've tried everything else. They've <i>also</i> probably tried lots of other things that Bradstreet has ideas on, didn't see progress, were the so called 'tough nuts', and eventually tried GC therpay. <br /><br />I'm not coming down on those parents, I was one and I understand their mind set, but I don't think we'd see 80% hits on a random sampling of kids with autism. Food for thought.<br /><br />- pDAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com